PUBLICLY AVAILABLE 3rd PARTY VERIFICATION INFORMATION

regarding litigants in Supreme Court of Queensland cases

Peterson v. Hottes and Swettenham v. Wild and Field v. Loh

PRESENTED IN REVERSE DATE ORDER.
Links go to PDF pages. Use your back button to return here.

BACK TO HOME PAGE

DISCLAIMER

THREAT/ TROLL ALERT

NOTE: Publicly and freely available online sources have been used to compile the information on this page, in order to distinguish the litigants from other people with the same names. This also protects the defendant in one case (Peterson v Hottes) in that a simple mis-spelling of the defendant's name in online searches goes to multiple links to online adult material unrelated to the defendant, and australiansense.com seeks to ensure that there is absolutely no inadvertant or by-extension confusion of that defendant with those links. Online searches for information about both the Plaintiff and the Defendant in each case were conducted. The right to privacy of individuals who may have knowledge of the particular case but who were not themselves litigants or testifying witnesses, requires that their identitities and locations remain undisclosed.

PETERSON v HOTTES

PLAINTIFF: D. L. Peterson: No current location-specific verification information is publicly available online. Formerly of Townsville and Brisbane, Queensland. If any legitimate publicly available information emerges, it will be provided here. Any confusion of identity with that of other persons with the same names is purely co-incidental. In particular, the identity of a person with the same name as the Plaintiff and currently living in Townsville, Queensland, and the identity of a person currently living in the Blue Mountains, NSW, Australia, is not to be confused with that of the Plaintiff.

DEFENDANT: Location-specific verification information of Ms Heidi Hottes/ Ms Julianne Heidi Hottes is publicly available online. Any confusion of identity with that of other persons with the same names is purely co-incidental. In particular, the following is provided to avert any confusion with a very famous "Heidi"; or with a private individual with exactly the same name living elsewhere; or with links to online material unrelated to the defendant.

2012 - Teaching at a Catholic high school college in Burnie, Tasmania, Australia. The specific reference is a hotlink email address for "Dr Hottes". Online information found through Google search 9 August, 2012. (Derived from verifiable time-stamped hard copy documentation of online information, held on file in support of this page.)

2010 - Teaching at a Catholic high school college in Burnie, Tasmania, Australia. See high School newsletter 2010 - half way down second column (Dr H Hottes, Room 59). (Derived from verifiable time-stamped hard copy documentation of online information, held on file in support of this page.)

2009 - Teaching through Adult Education in Devonport, Tasmania, Australia. Online information found through Google search 9 August, 2012. (Derived from verifiable time-stamped hard copy documentation of online information, held on file in support of this page.)

2007(?) - Extensive online business listings ("Black Cockatoo") for Julianne Hottes (a.k.a Heidi Hottes) at the disputed property 46 DiCaprio Circuit, Bridgeman Downs, Brisbane, Queensland. Online information found through Google search 9 August, 2012. (Derived from verifiable time-stamped hard copy documentation of online information, held on file in support of this page.)

ADDITIONALLY:
(1) The Supreme Court listing appears in Google search results: Peterson v. Hottes Supreme Court of Qld. (Online information found through Google search 9 August, 2012.)
(2) Specific Tasmanian residential address for the defendant was identified in February 2011. Full details remain unpublished here for privacy reasons. (Derived from verifiable time-stamped hard copy documentation, received unsolicited through legitimate attorney-to-attorney pathways in February 2011 and held confidentially on file by the site owner in support of this page.)

 

FIELD v LOH & ANOR

PLAINTIFF: Mrs M Field. Deceased.

DEFENDANT: Ngiap Siong Loh and Suray Binte Isnin. Previously at Lot 150 on registered plan 142337 and having title reference 50363926 (in Queensland). No current location-specific verification information is publicly available online. Any confusion of identity with that of other persons with the same names is purely co-incidental.

 

SWETTENHAM v WILD

PLAINTIFF: Leonard Swettenham - formerly at Nerang, Queensland, Australia. No current location-specific verification information is publicly available online. Any confusion of identity with that of other persons with the same names is purely co-incidental.

DEFENDANT: Rose-Marie Wild - formerly at Nerang, Queensland, Australia. No current location-specific verification information is publicly available online. Any confusion of identity with that of other persons with the same names is purely co-incidental.

 

Information current and accurate at 13 August 2012.

DISCLAIMER: This web page is created in the United States of America by a U.S. limited liability company (registered in the State of Delaware) under U.S. rights to free speech and educative reporting in the public interest. One sphere of relevant public interest is that of growing community awareness of troublesome issues affecting the elderly and their assets. This page has no affiliation with the Supreme Court of Queensland (Australia), the Court of Appeal (Queensland, Australia), the Plaintiffs, or the Defendants. The information above is from verifiable public domain sources only. The facts posted here are believed to be accurate and current at the time of posting. Online searches will reveal numerous individuals with the same names. In providing the above facts to distinguish the litigants from others with the same names, no other purpose is intended or implied, and no other purpose is to be inferred. No other use may be made of this information by third parties. No other information regarding the cases or the litigants themselves can be provided by this site. Email requests for more information about the litigants cannot be filled.

THREAT/ TROLL/ CYBERSTALKER/ STALKER ALERT - Aug 12, 2012; updated Aug 30, 2012 and Sept 15, 2012: Since July 23, 2012, through multiple public troll-posts at various pages on Facebook by an individual identifying as a "Bella London", the Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes and the Plaintiff's other daughter have been vilified and subjected to repeated personal attack and false allegations. "Bella London" claims to be a "supporter" of the Defendant in Peterson v Hottes. "Bella London" is not known to the Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes and her other daughter or any other family members of the Plaintiff. Without the consent or prior knowledge of either the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff's other daughter, "Bella London's" false allegations and vilification have totalled well over 100, distributed via Facebook. It has now been verified that this individual has been going to Facebook pages visited by the Plaintiff's other daughter and posting false allegations and character assassination comments at those pages. Although the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes is a physically frail-aged 82 year old who has no public profile and her location information is not publicly available, "Bella London" has repeatedly published, at those Facebook pages, the Blue Mountains, Australia, as the elderly Plaintiff's location. Both the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes and her other daughter have been repeatedly named in false public allegations about the substance and facts of the particular litigation. These statements are prejudicial to the Plaintiff's appeal which has not yet been heard. "Bella London" has also declared written intent with malice to further harm the Plaintiff's other daughter by creating a website or page with "the truth" about the Plaintiff's other daughter, if the latter does not comply with the third party's demands to take a particular course of action. This has been accompanied by the threat to publish "letters" unknown to the Plaintiff's other daughter and allusion to at least one other person possibly providing material and/ or assistance to carry out these threats. False, denigrating and damaging assertions as to the Plaintiff's character, that of her other daughter, and of the latter's professional life, including in association with her registered company, have repeatedly been made. Although the Plaintiff's other daughter was neither a litigant nor a testifying witness in the litigation, private facts about her have repeatedly been published by "Bella London". False allegations as to the Plaintiff's conduct of her case have been made. Private facts covered by privilege between the Plaintiff and her lawyers have also been published by "Bella London".

Given the specificity of detail that "Bella London", as a purported "supporter" of the Defendant, has multi-published pertaining to the Peterson v Hottes case, including private facts covered by attorney-client privilege and matters which remain sub judice, suspicions are now held that "Bella London" is, at minimum, a close associate of the Defendant acting behind a pseudonymous Facebook identity (the suspicion that "Bella London" could possibly even be the Defendant herself is also not ruled out).

Update - Sept 15, 2012: A concerned third party has brought to the attention of the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v. Hottes, and her other daughter, that as of 7 September, 2012, "Bella.London" newly purports via Facebook to reside at Springwood, NSW, a town within the Blue Mountains (Australia). The Blue Mountains (City of) is the location that "Bella London" has previously multi-published via Facebook as the location of the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes. Accordingly, "Bella London's" new claim to reside in a town within the Blue Mountains can only be construed as wilful intent to terrorize the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes.

In light of "Bella London's" actions and the fact that multiple cease and desist instructions to "Bella London" have repeatedly been ignored, the greatest concern is for the safety of the physically frail 82 year old Plaintiff in Peterson v. Hottes. Police at two locations are now alerted to the threat posed to the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes. Three community organizations have also been alerted. Anyone with knowledge of "Bella London", or of any parties purporting to be "supporters" of the Defendant in Peterson v Hottes and who are also involved in "Bella London's" activities towards the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes (and/ or towards the Plaintiff's other daughter), please contact this site urgently at the email address below and contact the police. Most importantly, if you have knowledge of any imminent or escalating threat to the Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes (or the Plaintiff's other daughter, or any other family members of the latter) please contact the police immediately.

Update: October 16, 2012: Ongoing inquiry has narrowed the probable ISP of "Bella London" to two possibilities originating from Tasmania, Australia, and an ISP based in Brisbane, Australia, might also be involved.

******

ADDITIONAL RE PRIVACY: Due to constant above-mentioned harassment and cyber-stalking directed towards the Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes, and towards the Plaintiff's other daughter, decrying the public domain availability of Public Record information reported on this site, the following additional clarification is provided. The right to privacy of non-litigants and non-witnesses in that particular case extends to the defendant's son - including his written communication to the plaintiff, the defendant's boyfriends (at least two had direct knowledge of the case), the plaintiff's care co-ordinator and care workers, the plaintiff's other daughter and other family members. All had knowledge of the case, but since they were not the litigants and were not testifying witnesses, the details of their knowledge of the case remain off the public record and they accordingly retain the right to privacy.

Substantiating documentation has been retained by australiansense.com in support of the Threat/ Troll Alert and these additional comments.

WA Management.

wa@wamanagement.com