SITE IS A WORK IN PROGRESS. INFORMATION IS ADDED AS AND WHEN POSSIBLE.
THE FOLLOWING FACTS ARE FOR THE SOLE EDUCATIVE PUBLIC INTEREST PURPOSE
OF PROVIDING INFORMATION TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO ARE INTERESTED
IN CONTENTIOUS LEGAL ISSUES AND EXISTING LAW INVOLVING THE ELDERLY,
THEIR ADULT CHILDREN OR THEIR FRIENDS/ CARERS, AND DISPUTED PROPERTY
ON THIS PAGE IN
REVERSE DATE ORDER:
(NOTE: Where possible, to distinguish the litigant/s from other individuals with the same names, verification information which is publicly and freely available online is provided here .)
PLAINTIFF: D.L. Peterson. 82 years. Australia. Mother of the Defendant.
DEFENDANT: Julianne Heidi Hottes. 57 years. (A.k.a. Heidi Hottes and Julianne Hottes). Tasmania, Australia. Daughter of the Plaintiff.
PLAINTIFF'S APPEAL 3292/12: Filed on 10 April, 2012, by lawyers and counsel on behalf of the Appellant/ Plaintiff.
PLAINTIFF'S SUPREME COURT CLAIM 3084/08: Filed 4 April, 2008, against the Defendant, Julianne Heidi Hottes, in respect of the house and land located at 46 DiCaprio Circuit, Bridgeman Downs, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; and chattels. Real property and chattels allegedly retained by the Defendant.
PLAINTIFF: Gladys May Taske. Formerly of 11 Ballantyne Court, Highfields, Qld.
DEFENDANT: Judy Maree Elliott. Lastly of 11 Ballantyne Court, Highfields, Qld.
PLAITIFF'S CLAIM: Funds provided by the plaintiff to the defendant from the sale of the plaintiff's property were, at the request of the defendant, for the purchase of a home in which both would live and that when the living arrangement collapsed the funds should be repaid to the plaintiff.
PLAINTIFF: May Field. Friend and fellow parishioner of the Defendants. Deceased.
DEFENDANT: Ngiap Siong Loh and Suray Binte Isnin. Friends and fellow parishioners of the Plaintiff.
PLAITIFF'S CLAIM: Lawyers for the Plaintiff argued that the Defendants held an equitable interest in the disputed property in trust for the Plaintiff. The disputed property was Lot 150 on registered plan 142337 and having title reference 50363926 (in Queensland).
DECISION TEXT - QSC350: Link http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QSC/2007/350.html Also at http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2007/QSC07-350.pdf External links. Use your browser back button to return here.
APPELLANT/ PLAINTIFF: Leonard Thomas George Swettenham. Formerly of Nerang. Father of the Defendant.
RESPONDENT/ DEFENDANT: Rose-Marie Beverly Wild. Formerly of Nerang. Daughter of the Plaintiff.
PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM: Lawyers for Mr Swettenham claimed equitable interest in the house and land at Lot 413 on RP 223343, County of Ward, Parish of Gilton in Queensland - i.e at Nerang in Queensland.
TEXT - QCA264: Link
Also at http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2005/QCA05-289.pdf
TO VIEW OR OBTAIN COURT DOCUMENTS &/or PLEADINGS &/or TRIAL OR APPEAL TRANSCRIPTS &/or DECISIONS (Judgements) of any case:
Worldwide: World Legal Information Institute Full text of decisions can be found online via this database which links to decisions worldwide. Searches by name are usually sufficient. E.g. a search for "Swettenham v Wild" goes to the Court of Appeal (Queensland) decision.
Australia: Australasian Legal Information Institute Full text of decisions can be found online via this database which links to decisions throughout Australia and New Zealand. E.g. a search for "Swettenham v Wild" goes to the Court of Appeal (Queensland) decision.
DISCLAIMER: This web page is created in the United States of America by a U.S. limited liability company (registered in the State of Delaware) under U.S. rights to free speech and educative reporting in the public interest. One sphere of relevant public interest is that of growing community awareness of troublesome issues affecting the elderly and their assets. This page has no affiliation with the Supreme Court or Appeal Court of Queensland (Australia), the Plaintiffs, or the Defendants. The information above is from verifiable public record and public domain sources only and has been provided purely for educative public interest purposes. The facts posted here are believed to be accurate and current at the time of posting. In providing the above facts for educative public interest purposes only, no other purpose is intended or implied, and no other purpose is to be inferred. No other use may be made of this information by third parties. No other information beyond distinguishing information about the litigants can be provided by this site. Email requests for more information cannot be filled.
Updated on August 12, 2012.
THREAT/ TROLL/ CYBERSTALKER/ STALKER ALERT - Aug 12, 2012; updated Aug 30, 2012 and Sept 15, 2012: Since July 23, 2012, through multiple public troll-posts at various pages on Facebook by an individual identifying as a "Bella London", the Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes (aka PetersonvHottes) and the Plaintiff's other daughter have been vilified and subjected to repeated personal attack and false allegations. "Bella London" claims to be a "supporter" of the Defendant in Peterson v Hottes (aka PetersonvHottes) . "Bella London" is not known to the Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes and her other daughter or any other family members of the Plaintiff. Without the consent or prior knowledge of either the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff's other daughter, "Bella London's" false allegations and vilification have totalled between 70 - 100, distributed via Facebook. It has now been verified that this individual has been going to Facebook pages visited by the Plaintiff's other daughter and posting false allegations and character assassination comments at those pages. Although the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes (aka PetersonvHottes) is a physically frail-aged 82 year old who has no public profile and her location information is not publicly available, "Bella London" has repeatedly published, at those Facebook pages, the Blue Mountains, Australia, as the elderly Plaintiff's location. Both the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes (aka PetersonvHottes) and her other daughter have been repeatedly named in false public allegations about the substance and facts of the particular litigation. These statements are prejudicial to the Plaintiff's appeal which has not yet been heard. "Bella London" has also declared written intent with malice to further harm the Plaintiff's other daughter by creating a website or page with "the truth" about the Plaintiff's other daughter, if the latter does not comply with the third party's demands to take a particular course of action. This has been accompanied by the threat to publish "letters" unknown to the Plaintiff's other daughter and allusion to at least one other person possibly providing material and/ or assistance to carry out these threats. False, denigrating and damaging assertions as to the Plaintiff's character, that of her other daughter, and of the latter's professional life, including in association with her registered company, have repeatedly been made. Although the Plaintiff's other daughter was neither a litigant nor a testifying witness in the litigation, private facts about her have repeatedly been published by "Bella London". False allegations as to the Plaintiff's conduct of her case have been made. Private facts covered by privilege between the Plaintiff and her lawyers have also been published by "Bella London".
Given the specificity of detail that "Bella London", as a purported "supporter" of the Defendant, has multi-published pertaining to the Peterson v Hottes case (aka PetersonvHottes) , including private facts covered by attorney-client privilege and matters which remain sub judice, suspicions are now held that "Bella London" is, at minimum, a close associate of the Defendant acting behind a pseudonymous Facebook identity (the suspicion that "Bella London" could possibly even be the Defendant herself is also not ruled out).
Update - Sept 15, 2012: A concerned third party has brought to the attention of the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v. Hottes (aka PetersonvHottes), and her elder daughter, that as of 7 September, 2012, "Bella.London" newly purports via Facebook to reside at Springwood, NSW, a town within the Blue Mountains (Australia). The Blue Mountains (City of) is the location that "Bella London" has previously multi-published via Facebook as the location of the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes (aka PetersonvHottes). Accordingly, "Bella London's" new claim to reside in a town within the Blue Mountains can only be construed as wilful intent to terrorize the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes.
In light of "Bella London's" actions and the fact that multiple cease and desist instructions to "Bella London" have repeatedly been ignored, the greatest concern is for the safety of the physically frail 82 year old Plaintiff in Peterson v. Hottes. Police at two locations are now alerted to the threat posed to the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes (aka PetersonvHottes). Three community organizations have also been alerted. Anyone with knowledge of "Bella London", or of any parties purporting to be "supporters" of the Defendant in Peterson v Hottes and who are also involved in "Bella London's" activities towards the elderly Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes (and/ or towards the Plaintiff's elder daughter), please contact this site urgently at the email address below and contact the police. Most importantly, if you have knowledge of any imminent or escalating threat to the Plaintiff in Peterson v Hottes (or the Plaintiff's elder daughter, or any other family members of the latter) please contact the police immediately.
Update: October 16, 2012: Ongoing inquiry has narrowed the probable ISP of "Bella London" to two possibilities originating from Tasmania, Australia, and an ISP based in Brisbane, Australia, might also be involved.
Substantiating documentation has been retained by australiansense.com in support of the Threat/ Troll Alert and these additional comments.